Most of them have never done it before. They arrive at a product they dont fully trust, face steps they dont fully understand, and make financial decisions with real consequences if something goes wrong. This role exists to make that experience work.
For regulatory reasons, only candidates currently based in the European Union can be considered for this role. No exceptions. No relocation support or visa sponsorship is available.
First-time cross-border senders face compounding uncertainty. Exchange rates move. Fees are not always obvious. Compliance steps appear unexpectedly. Payment methods behave differently depending on where the user is and where the money is going.
Most products respond to this by hiding complexity or deferring it. This product responds by making everything transparent upfront. Your job is to make that transparency feel safe and navigable rather than intimidating, and to ensure that users who start a transfer actually finish one.
Youll own the design of the entire first-transfer journey: from the moment a new user arrives through identity verification, recipient setup, funding selection, and completed transaction. This is a high-stakes conversion problem and a genuinely hard design challenge.
If you cannot demonstrate most of these clearly in your CV and portfolio, this role is unlikely to be a fit right now. The screening process will filter against these specifically before any manual review takes place.
You are not waiting for a brief. You are expected to:
This role is measured on outcomes, not output. The metrics that matter:
If those numbers move in the right direction, the work is succeeding.
Design sits inside cross-functional squads alongside product, engineering, analytics, and compliance. It shapes strategy directly and is not a service function. Work is shared early and challenged often. Designers own their metrics, run their own experiments, and are expected to escalate clearly when business priorities conflict with user needs. The operating principle is straightforward: the users ability to make an informed financial decision is never sacrificed for a short-term conversion gain.
Firstly - while applying you will be asked to record a 1-minute video answering why this role is suitable for you. Only the content of your answer will be assessed, not your background, equipment, or how you are dressed. This is to cut noise and speak only to people who show commitment and understand what this role is about.
Here is what good looks like in that video:
Secondly - I use an AI-assisted screening tool to do a first pass on applications before I review them manually. It does not make final decisions. I do. But it flags applications that do not clearly address the five criteria listed above, and that shapes the depth and order of my review. If the AI flags something I am unsure about, I will review it manually and may reach out with clarifying questions.
If your application does not speak to those five things directly, it will likely be deprioritized regardless of how strong your broader experience is.
Beyond the screening pass, your portfolio is the primary signal. I want end-to-end case studies with honest problem framing, your specific contribution, the trade-offs you navigated, and real outcomes including what did not work.
If this is how you already work, apply. If some of it is still aspirational rather than demonstrated, that is useful information before you invest the time.
Either way, you will hear back from me within 7 days. That is a promise, not a pleasantry.